Difference between revisions of "Design Documentation"

Revision as of 17:27, 6 September 2007

as we are still in the experimentation phase there isn't too much design documentation yet.

ship internals : see this forum thread : http://freegamer.schattenkind.net/index.php?t=msg&th=169&start=0

chatlogs

to get an impression of what we have in mind you can read these chatlogs :

• http://ghoulsblade.schattenkind.net/sfz/chatlogs/sfzchat_design_07.08.2007.txt
• http://ghoulsblade.schattenkind.net/sfz/chatlogs/sfzchat_29.08.2007_1.txt
• http://ghoulsblade.schattenkind.net/sfz/chatlogs/sfzchatlog__06.09.2007_gameoverview.txt

style

we are currently discussing art style, and are considering a slight toon shader to avoid photo realism

• forum thread : http://freegamer.schattenkind.net/index.php?t=msg&th=209
• chatlog : http://ghoulsblade.schattenkind.net/sfz/chatlogs/sfzchat_2007.09.05_artstyle.txt
• GraphicStyleBrainstorming
• CellShadingNotes

Draft

short description

TODO

gameplay aspects

very important

• lan based coop multiplayer
• fly/control a spaceship
• walk inside spaceships
• possibility to create own ships and design their interior
• explore planets, ships, spacestations ... (you can enter them)
• trading
• collecting things (ie. different types of flowers)
• drive vehicles on the planet surface
• quests

nice to have

• share content (collected stuff, ship design...) online with other players

scenario, environment

TODO

graphic style

TODO

combat system suggestions

there is a discussion and in the forum : http://freegamer.schattenkind.net/index.php?t=msg&goto=1432

as there are several very different and interesting suggestions a compromise might leave most of us equally unhappy, so we might capsule the combat system in such a way that it is easy to replace by plugins/mods.

suggestions :

• CombatSuggestion SimpleAndIntuitive

design

• we want to minimize grinding, this affects many design decisions, see also below "anti-grinding"
• no unlimited fleet size / fleet management : that would turn the game into a strategy-game and we don't want that
  • no remote autopilot : ships don't move when not directly piloted by a player
  • maybe a small amount of npc pilots, but not unlimited (limit could be explained by mutiny)
  • taxing ships/shipsize and crew wages cannot be used for balancing/limiting fleet size (see below : "anti-grinding")

• all players are in the same team (it is a coop game)
  • not fighting against other teams, but all players agains the npc-universe or somthing like that
  • players don't have individual property (e.g. everything belongs to the whole team)
  • the team itself makes progress when doing mission (aquires new equipment construction plans)
  • players can join / leave at arbitrary times
    • there should be no need to aquire enough equipment or experience for a player to be valuable (see also anti-grinding below)
  • multiple players can be inside the same spaceship
  • repairing stuff inside the ship might be interesting for combat
  • cooperatively playing a campaign would be cool, e.g. doing story-related missions and collecting equipment plans as rewards
  • no individual savegames/property of players, all belongs to the TEAM,
    • so arbitrary number of players can share stuff, anyone can join/leave at any time.
    • no individual power/level differences, this elegantly avoids strong-player+weak-player problems (see also "anti-grinding")

• death/ship-destruction = loss of equipment
  • no instant respawn with the same ship
  • dying will hurt a bit, but you'll be back on track quickly (see below : "anti-grinding")
  • no gameplay/story/campaign progress will be lost, equipment-construction plans etc are not destroyed
  • when your ship is destroyed, it is gone, no respawning with the same equipment, so you need a new one
  • the team can capture a new ship for the player (see "boarding")
  • you can have a simple fighter
  • equipment itself is easy to replace as the construction plans for it are not lost (see below : "anti-grinding")
  • if the team has a big mothership/carrier with multiple fighters in the hangar, the player can just take the next fighter until they are all gone
  • maybe : you can have more than one ship but only fly one at once

• not too much RPG
  • no complex skill tree's, but simple jobs/professions/specialities are ok (mechanic, medic, ...)
  • in a scifi-scenario with highly advanced software, the speed, hit-chance in combat (of the ship) etc should depend on equipment, not on the human-skills.
  • no experience/skill grinding, probably just pick the skill at start and change profession at stations

• exploring and collecting (equipment-plans,decoration,plants,animals..) should be important gameplay elements

• the amount of equipment/weapons in use is limited by the available reactor power
  • energy management is interesting in combat with batteries being recharged by the reactor while you don't fire
  • while your shields restore themselves they require more energy than while they are up
  • maybe an energy consuming afterburner for extra speed in combat ?
  • energy consuming equipment like anti-missile, shieldboost, maneuver-boost, cloak ...

boarding

• enemy ships can be crippled/disabled and boarded.
• when the shields are down and armor is damaged to below something like 30% the ships is "disabled"
  • alternate : this only happens with emp weapons (lightning-tesla-like weapon, emp-torpedo/missiles) ?
• a "disabled" ship cannot move or fire
• player ships can dock to the disabled ship
• players can then overcome the crew of the ship (either decided via random or later with real indoor fighting)
• if they succeed, they can take cargo,equipment, or even switch ships
• if the ship is small enough it might be added to the hangar of the mothership

shipedit

• ship properties (speed,turn..) might be affected/based by/on components assembled via ship editor
• ship-editor balancing :
  • hardcap : only one reactor per ship, but differnent types (with different mass/energy output)
  • energy management : reactor produces energy, other components consume energy (shield,engine,weapons...)
  • maybe heat management
  • more ship components means more mass -> less maneuverability
• cool blueprint images could be automatically generated
• damage to the outside could be accurately reflected on the inside

anti-grinding

see also http://freegamer.schattenkind.net/index.php?t=msg&goto=1280

• we want to minimize grinding (repetitive, non-entertaining gameplay to aquire ressources,money or experience)
• making things expansive cannot be used as primary balancing, that'll only lead to more grinding
  • taxing ships/shipsize and crew wages cannot be used for balancing/limiting fleet size
• discouraging grinding might even lead to better balancing, as grinding will not be rewarded
• a game not focused on grinding will be more suitable for occasional fun without longterm engagement (more casual?)
• we consider a money-less trading systems

• mission rewards : construction plans for equipment
  • cooperative progress when doing missions : the team aquires more and more equipment plans
  • motivation for doing specific missions is not to gain the most money, but an interesting equipment part
  • players can build as "many" equipment parts as they want, but can only use a limited number of them at once
    • so grinding does not lead to super-power
  • gathering ressources for equipment should be quick, no mindless asteroid mining for hours, more like seconds
    • resource gathering could be made interesting and combined with exploration by requiring different materials
    • there should be more places to gather minerals than asteroids : gas giants, space-nebulae, planets : plants,liquid-lakes,mining
    • chemical reactions and modification like smelting would be interesting and make crafting interesting