User:Mikel Prusha
Misadventures in VC Funding: The $24 Million Moz Virtually Raised
by randfish on August 29, 2011
Above the training course of this calendar year, I’ve written a couple instances about elevating a potential spherical of venture funding for my company, SEOmoz. Finally, the saga’s more than, I’ve been released from conditions of confidentiality and I can reveal the lengthy, strange story of how I initial rejected, was eventually persuaded, but ultimately did not raise a second round of expense richesse.
photo credit
My hope is the fact that by sharing, other folks can understand from our expertise and perhaps avoid a number of the mistakes, pitfalls and soreness we confronted.
Raising funds for the startup is undoubtedly an inherently risky proposition. You step approximately the plate knowing the odds are slim and that, for each story of accomplishment on TechCrunch, there is 2 hundred companies pounding the street, acquiring nowhere. We went the opposite route - allowing investors arrive to us (a method I wrote about last yr). That is the story of that have - being “pitched” by traders, the decision-making and negotiation processes along with the conclude final results.
Do We really Want to Elevate a Spherical?
In November of very last year, 14 months right after my earlier failed endeavor to raise capital, we began obtaining inquiries from a number of businesses - venture capitalists and private/growth equity investors, inquiring if SEOmoz was enthusiastic about pursuing funding. My answer was usually exactly the same, and seemed fairly comparable for the email beneath:
Over the following months (Nov 2010 - April 2011) we hunkered down, focused on product, engineering and marketing and grew the organization, mainly ignoring the chance of outside funding.
In March of 2011, 1 certain investor (whom I’ll make reference to from the relaxation of this publish as “Neil”) attained out to us and was particularly thrilled concerning the SEO/inbound marketing sector and SEOmoz particularly. He sent this electronic mail right after our contact:
It had been flattering and fascinating to really feel this wonderful degree of curiosity within our enterprise from an investor, and Neil wasn’t the only 1, both. Here’s an inventory of the folks we talked to seriously (meaning more than just a simple mobile phone contact or e mail) more than the initial 7 months of 2011:
• Bessemer Venture Partners • GRP Companions • Stripes Group • Insight Ventures • JMI Equity • Degree Equity • Mayfield Money • Accel Partners • Summit Companions • NEA • General Catalyst • K1 • Market Ventures
For your corporations famous higher than, I’ll preserve details of who we spoke to and the way far we progressed non-public (as I did in my publish on the 2009 expertise) employing pseudonyms.
The week of May possibly 8th, I met with 3 traders in Ny city and one in Boston. In preparing for these conferences, I attempted to remind myself that money may not be the most effective factor for that business using a public blog publish on the theme. I used to be targeted about the goals of developing relationships, sharing our trajectory and understanding approximately doable about how other folks viewed our company and market place.
Regardless of this bevvy of interest, my earlier fundraising knowledge had left me gun-shy and reticent about committing. A week right after the conferences in NYC, the Moz group had a serious chat about whether or not elevating a round might have a serious, good effect on the company. That dialogue involved a lot of back-and-forth, nevertheless the factors we in the end made a decision to check the waters much more critically integrated:
• Expand Engineering - For your initial quarter of 2010, we had a mandate to expand the engineering team so we could enhance our product more rapidly. This proved amazingly challenging, because the much-reported tech expertise wars in Seattle developed a vacuum of big-data savvy SDEs. Nevertheless, in Q2, our place shifted as we have been capable of considerably expand the engineering team - to some extent wherever we had to slow employing so as to help keep payroll in step with our bootstrapped development. While certainly a positive, this variation meant that we have been minimal by funds inside the financial institution for that 1st time in a although.
• Scale Knowledge - Linkscape, Blogscape and our APIs price ~$100K/month at the commencing in the calendar year. In Q2, this expense had risen 30% and we foresaw a nearby time when it will double or maybe more. In July of this year, these fees were, in fact, practically $200K. We’ve gone from forty virtual machines hosted on Amazon to 200 , and even though we’re thrilled to find out our metrics (mozRank, Domain Authority, et al) achieve widespread adoption, a lot of the weighty end users use our cost-free API, leaving our revenue from other channels to assist these fees. Long-term, we imagine in totally free, open information like a way to increase the brand, the business and our revenue-producing channels (and it’s part of our core values for being as open up and generous as is possible with our info), however the money restrictions had finally grow to be some extent of disappointment, and one more purpose to hunt development money.
• Increase Facilities/Benefits/Team Happiness - The Moz offices can comfortably hold 45-50 men and women, but we realized that by Q3, we’d presently be at that variety. We also recognized which the aforementioned talent wars had been pushing us to develop the assortment of rewards and area we provide for the group. Moz was named #6 on Seattle’s Greatest Areas to Operate, but we’re striving for #1, and we strongly believe that the better we could take care of our crew, the more amazing our output and results will be.
• Launch New Merchandise - Our massive info assignments have already been difficult, and also extremely gratifying, and we felt a robust push to do far more, more rapidly. We would like to produce advertising analytics outside of pure Search engine marketing, relocating to subject like social, material advertising and marketing, nearby and verticals (mobile, video clip, websites, and so forth. - anything that sends site visitors on the net organically). A few of those need large upfront investments in knowledge sources, engineering and industry investigation. One particular with the weird items I’ve identified (which probably deserves a publish of its own at some point) is always that the more substantial your scale, the longer it takes to construct solution. You’d think that having fifteen full-time engineers plus a considerable support staff close to them would suggest quicker advancement, however it doesn’t - the scale we need to assistance (nearly 14K spending clients and 250K customers of our totally free items) for something we release signifies far higher interest to architecture, reliability and high quality then when we had two devs and five hundred customers.
• Put money into Advertising - Right now, most of SEOmoz’s acquisition of new clients is via inbound/organic channels (~80%). We identify there is a good deal of area for growth in both natural and organic (content advertising, far more local community expense, Search engine optimisation, social, and many others) and in compensated marketing and advertising. An expense right here would enable us to have a more time view on customer payback time period (some time till we recoup an expense in acquisition) and experiment in new channels, as well.
• Give Liquidity to Founders - Gillian launched the company that may become SEOmoz in 1981 and I’ve been working together with her considering that 2001. As Gillian’s stepped other than day-to-day duties (submit 2008) and taken on much more of an exterior evangelism position, most of us felt that supplying her a more formal exit and liquidation route can be an ideal alternative. I also personally felt it had been smart to just take some funds off the table.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t also mention yet another meeting in Boston - with Hubspot’s Dharmesh Shah. For that earlier handful of years, Dharmesh is a fantastic mentor to me, and somebody whom I usually flip to when big selections like this seem. About the theme of funding, he gave distinct, well-reasoned assistance (and later on, built that guidance public). We satisfied in May, just after my in-person conferences in The big apple, and mentioned which the mix of an excellent marketplace for expense as well as robust expansion with the company made for excellent fundraising circumstances.
Testing the Waters for the Large Financing Round…
Hence, in mid-May, when Neil asked to comply with up with the in-person check out to our offices in Seattle, I sent the subsequent email reply:
Right after that meeting in Seattle, points received very hot and hefty. Neil wanted to do a deal and we commenced talking conditions. It had been at this stage that our executive group and board of directors determined to take some measures to insure that we had been generating the right moves. These included:
• Meeting with and, hopefully, receiving gives from 2-3 with the other companies who had reached out to Moz to help you check the waters on valuation and deal conditions, and also to be sure we had a associate and investor we loved.
• Deep-diving on Neil and his organization. We ended up speaking straight to folks at two of their portfolio businesses, numerous folks who labored with Neil in his previous roles and back-channeling to nearly half a dozen other people who’d worked with him in one way or yet another via our network of contacts (each at Moz, and thru Ignition Companions, our traders from 2007).
• Functioning tough on long-term, strategic arranging for 2012 and beyond - what did we wish to do, how much wouldn\\\'t it consider, and in which would the money be invested?
• Preparing a semi-formal slide deck to pitch the partnership at Ignition, as we wanted them to participate in the spherical too. We also built a mild version of this deck to send around to several individuals while in the subject and assist drum up any potential curiosity with out being too forward or pushy.
• Investigating the fundraising market for self-service SaaS firms like ours by chatting to as numerous lately funded entrepreneurs within the space as you can. By way of this investigation, we hoped to have a great concept of what types of terms and valuation we should assume, and what was “market” (VC-speak for “normal”).
In mid-June, I produced a visit to San Francisco, ostensibly to take part in SimplyHired’s Search engine optimization Meetup, but in addition for many Bay-Area conferences with VCs. Three of these became far more critical discussions.
June was also once we began to really feel a bit cocky. We were in active negotiations with Neil. We had numerous talks going with investors inside the Bay Region, and practically every week, we had a ping from a brand new source reaching out to see if we ended up all set to begin a conversation. I spoke to dozens of people by cellphone and electronic mail and realized a good deal a lot more in regards to the industry - and people conversations gave me a great deal of reasons to get energized. As in 2007, a good deal of startups ended up reporting a very hot marketplace for raising cash. Valuations of many SaaS companies I talked with ended up while in the 6-10X revenue assortment (and people who raised in Q1/Q2 acquired valued on their 2011 approximated revenues)!
Narrowing Down the Field
Throughout the method, we’d been further careful on the traders we engaged. We turned absent one particular company because of into a bad experience we had with them in 2009 (electronic mail under).
This example wasn’t alone - we turned away yet another after chatting to a few of their portfolio companies along with a business they’d look at but did not spend money on and hearing about some questionable behavior.
Our largest filter wasn’t deal conditions or price tag, but cultural match. We’d been warned many times against adding an investor who did not share our core values or who exhibited any dishonest/manipulative strategies in our discussions. That ruled out some individuals, and also built us more energized about Neil, “Reggie” (an investor in California) and “Todd” (at one more California-based company).
One particular of my favorite email messages in our method arrived from Reggie, who sent this just just before their in-person visit towards the Mozplex:
Lovable, appropriate?! Occasionally, it’s the minor things. Neil usually asked about my grandmother in New Jersey (she had a tough drop, a concussion and put in some weeks in hospitals, but is now nearly 100% and carrying out nicely). Todd wolfed down many helpings of phenomenal braised pork shoulder created by our methods engineer, David. Sarah and I dragged both Neil and Reggie to meals with both of our considerable other people.
But, the fundraising approach definitely wasn’t all entertaining, and it did need a tremendous amount of work, specifically from Sarah, Moz’s COO, and from Jamie Joanna on our marketing crew, who held numerous calls with investors on the ton of membership acquisition/retention-related topics. Here’s a brief snippet of a weekend electronic mail thread that Sarah sent to Todd:
In June and July, the funding process most likely entailed countless blended hrs of work around the portion of our staff - significantly of which was me, but loads pass on to other departments and features. We understood this was a really big selection - one that may massively affect the longer term of the organization - and thus, we wanted to be as diligent, thoughtful and cautious as is possible.
By early July, we were all the way down to 4 perhaps severe investors. A single made a decision towards creating a suggestion around the center with the month. The other individuals have been Neil (from NY), Reggie (from CA) and Todd (also CA).
Closing the Offer
At the starting of July, a single of the traders produced a proposal at a $50mm pre-money valuation for any $25mm expense. Here’s my e mail reply:
That provide was subsequently raised to $65mm pre-money, which was matched by yet another agency (the two Neil Reggie). I was feeling rather good about my negotiation skills, till a couple weeks afterwards.
Todd was an early favored of a number of Mozzers. In the finish of his visit to our offices, I gave him a journey back for the airport (I borrowed Geraldine‘s only-slightly-dented 2003 Kia Spectra, considering that I don’t actually own an automobile). Near the finish with the conversation, Todd famous that his organization “would use a tough time getting to $100mm” on our deal. I most likely should have corrected him at that point (it might have been the TAGFEE factor to accomplish), but I instead said one thing like “this isn’t totally regarding the highest pre-money valuation; it is regarding the appropriate fit for us.” This may serve being a good case in point of why I should not try to “play the game.” Every week later on, soon after a lot of back-and-forth, Todd famous that his firm basically couldn’t match our valuation expectations, and though interested, could be backing out.
I’m undecided if our technique with Todd was a giant misstep or a modest 1, nor whether or not they\\\'d have created a proposal in the $60-$70mm variety if they’d thought which was our goal. I also do not know why he assumed we had been provided individuals much higher numbers, nor what we should always have carried out from there. We might have gone back again and pushed on what they believed we needed, nevertheless it seemed some time had handed (tough to describe why/how precisely).
We built our determination, sent a polite be aware to Reggie thanking him and an additional to Neil declaring we had been prepared to move.
Pitching Ignition Companions
Furthermore to raising money from an outside companion, we also wanted Ignition, who had set $1mm into your company in 2007 to participate in this following spherical. Their help would be helpful in generating outdoors investors feel fantastic in regards to the offer, and would assist us have a lot more shared ownership amongst our board members.
Under is the pitch deck I useful for Ignition (areas of this made it in to the “light” model we sent to various other people earlier while in the approach): SEOmoz Pitch Deck July 2011
Look at far more presentations from Rand Fishkin
We’ve had a terrific partnership with Ignition about the years, and I carry on to advocate them to startups of all kinds. As component of the “thank-you” for their assist, Geraldine baked some cookie bars the night time ahead of our pitch meeting, which I introduced to their offices and handed out before the presentation. I took a photograph hoping that I’d manage to reveal it around the blog as soon as the offer was done:
Observe the delicious-looking baked merchandise within the table
Ignition confirmed, just following this meeting, that they’d enjoy to take part in our next spherical, in what ever amount built sensation towards the outdoors, lead investor. We had been thrilled, and put in some serious time in July arranging a extensive approach around the best way to expand with all the funding. We even started some conversations with other businesses we had been considering getting.
Neil introduced numerous people from his firm to our annual Mozcon in Seattle. About the very last afternoon, we satisfied to negotiate some last conditions of the offer. It ended up searching such as this:
• $24mm invested; $19mm from Neil and $5mm from Ignition • $65mm pre-money valuation, $89mm submit • $18mm to SEOmoz’s harmony sheet; $4.75mm to Gillian, $1.25mm to Rand • No liquidation desire for Collection B (Ignition incorporates a 1X around the Series A) • Straight preferred (that means that the investor possibly will get their money out in a very sale Or perhaps the % with the organization they possess, although not both) • New board would come with myself and Sarah (our COO), Michelle (from Ignition, who’s been on our board since 2007)
